Demotu vs Dartfish
Demotu and Dartfish both help coaches understand movement on video, through fundamentally different methods. Dartfish is expert-driven video analysis with two decades of history in elite sport: frame-by-frame review, drawings and angle measurements on the footage, and signature compositing tools like SimulCam and StroMotion. The analysis is as good as the analyst, and it takes an analyst's time. Demotu automates the measurement: computer vision extracts 3D joint kinematics from a phone recording in seconds, scores the movement, and feeds the result straight into training.
The short version: if your work is game analysis, tagging, and expert video breakdowns for technique sports, Dartfish's toolset is built for that craft. If you want objective, repeatable movement measurement that leads directly into programming, that's Demotu.
Choose Dartfish if…
Dartfish is a craft tool with real pedigree, and for some analysts it's the right call.
- You do game and match analysis with tagging panels, or run video review for a federation
- Expert-annotated breakdowns (drawings, overlays, side-by-side) are your deliverable
- You want compositing tools like SimulCam and StroMotion for technique comparison
- An analyst's time on each clip is part of your workflow, not a bottleneck
Choose Demotu if…
Demotu makes sense when measurement should be automatic, and lead somewhere.
- You want joint-level movement data computed automatically, not drawn on the frame by hand
- You screen many athletes and can't spend analyst minutes on every clip
- You want assessments scored, tracked against baseline, and comparable over time
- You want the assessment to flow directly into programming and the athlete's app
Category by category.
How the analysis happens
Demotu is automatedDemotu
Automated 3D kinematics
Computer vision extracts joint angles, asymmetries, and compensations in seconds
Dartfish
Expert manual review
Frame-by-frame replay, hand-drawn angles and annotations on the footage
Why it matters: Dartfish quantifies what the analyst draws; Demotu computes the measurement itself. That difference sets how many athletes you can cover.
Video craft tools
Dartfish winsDemotu
Assessment-focused capture
Recording exists to be measured, scored, and tracked
Dartfish
SimulCam & StroMotion
Performance compositing, overlays, tagging panels, and broadcast-grade review tools
Why it matters: For visual storytelling and technique comparison footage, Dartfish's toolset has no equivalent in Demotu.
From analysis to training
Demotu winsDemotu
Closed loop
Results feed programming, the athlete app, and reassessment in one platform
Dartfish
Ends at the video
Analyzed clips are shared and published; no training or programming product in the lineup
Why it matters: Dartfish's output is an analyzed video. Demotu's output is a program the athlete trains on tomorrow.
Pricingas of August 2026
Both publishedDemotu
From $70/mo
Movement analysis, programming, and athlete app in one subscription
Dartfish
From about 7 to 180 euros/mo
Tiered from mobile apps to Pro desktop suites, billed annually
The hidden cost: Dartfish's software price doesn't include the analyst hours each clip takes. Demotu's analysis time is seconds per assessment.
Dartfish's video craft tools are unmatched, its federation pedigree is real, and its entry pricing is lower. Expert video breakdowns and automated movement measurement are different jobs; decide which one you are hiring for.
The full breakdown
| Feature | Demotu | Dartfish |
|---|---|---|
| Automated movement analysis | 3D markerlessComputed joint kinematics from any smartphone camera | Not offeredProduct pages describe manual review and annotation tools |
| Joint measurements | Computed automaticallyAngles, asymmetries, mobility and stability scoring | Drawn by the analystAngle and time measurement tools applied on the video |
| Video compositing & overlays | Not offered | SimulCam & StroMotionSignature comparison and motion-trail effects |
| Game & match analysis | Not offered | Dedicated productsTagging panels, live analysis, and VAR systems |
| Training delivery & programming | Full platformPrograms, athlete app, tracking, reassessment | Not offeredSharing and publishing of analyzed video only |
| Longitudinal athlete tracking | Built inEvery assessment scored against baseline over time | Via saved video librariesComparison is manual, clip to clip |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, web | Windows desktop + mobile appsPro tiers on desktop; Express and Mobile apps for capture |
| Pricing | From $70/moListed publicly | From about 7 euros/moUp to 120 to 180 euros/mo for Pro tiers, billed annually; 15-day trial |
Dartfish pricing is from dartfish.com/plans in euros, billed annually, as of August 20, 2026; US pricing may differ. Demotu pricing from demotuapp.com/pricing.
What Dartfish does better
Frequently asked questions
Does Dartfish do automated movement analysis?
Dartfish's published product pages describe expert-driven tools: frame-by-frame replay, manual drawings, angle and time measurement applied on the video, tagging, and compositing effects like SimulCam and StroMotion. We found no automated pose estimation or 3D biomechanics features advertised as of August 2026. Demotu's analysis is automated: computer vision computes joint-level kinematics from the recording in seconds.
Is Demotu a replacement for Dartfish?
For movement assessment, yes: Demotu automates what would otherwise take analyst time per clip, and adds scoring, baselines, and programming. For game analysis, match tagging, and broadcast-style video breakdowns, no: that's Dartfish's territory, and Demotu doesn't offer those tools. Some organizations legitimately need both jobs done.
How do the prices compare?
Dartfish publishes tiers from about 7 euros/month for mobile up to 120 to 180 euros/month for Pro desktop suites, billed annually with a 15-day trial, as of August 2026. Demotu runs $70 to $160/month for individuals and from $200/month for organizations. The bigger cost difference is time: Dartfish analysis takes expert minutes per clip, Demotu's takes seconds.
Can physios and clinicians use either tool?
Both market to clinicians. With Dartfish, a clinician reviews and annotates footage manually. With Demotu, the assessment is measured automatically (joint angles, asymmetries, compensations), tracked against baseline, and turned into corrective programming the client follows in the app.
What happens to my existing video workflows if I switch?
Demotu doesn't import Dartfish projects, and there are no training programs to migrate since Dartfish doesn't deliver training. Most teams that adopt Demotu alongside or after Dartfish simply start baselining athletes fresh: each assessment takes seconds, so a full roster is usually captured within a session.
Related comparisons
Measure in seconds what review takes minutes to see.
Run a real assessment and compare the output against your annotation workflow. Book a demo and bring your own footage.
Dartfish is a trademark of its respective owner. Demotu is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Dartfish. Feature and pricing information was gathered from public sources and verified as of August 20, 2026; details may have changed since. If you spot something outdated or inaccurate, let us know and we'll correct it promptly.
Sources: Dartfish motion analysis · Dartfish plans · Demotu pricing